21 Mar

‘History will remember Obama as the great slayer of patent trolls.’

Obama has been duped or doped.

“patent troll”

infringers and their paid puppets’ definition of ‘patent troll’:

anyone who sues us for stealing their invention

All this talk about trolls is just spin control by large infringers and their paid puppets to cover up their theft.

The patent system now teeters on the brink of lawlessness. Call it what you will…patent hoarder, patent troll, non-practicing entity, shell company, etc. It all means one thing: “we’re using your invention and we’re not going to stop or pay”. It’s a pure red herring by large invention thieves and their paid puppets to kill any inventor support system. Their goal is to legalize theft. The fact is, many of the large multinationals and their puppets who defame inventors in this way themselves make no products in the US or create any American jobs and it is their continued blatant theft which makes it impossible for the true creators to do so. To infringers the only patents that are legitimate are their own -if they have any. Meanwhile, the huge multinationals ship more and more US jobs overseas.

Those wishing to help fight big business giveaways should contact us as below and join the fight as we are building a network of inventors and other stakeholders to lobby Congress to restore property rights for all patent owners -large and small.

For the truth about trolls, please see


One Response to “”

  1. staff3 March 22, 2014 at 3:30 am #

    also in response to the Wired article…

    This article is full of false facts and misinformation.

    Using the link in this statement from the article “And the Supreme Court is mulling a case on whether patent trolls should pay legal fees to the other side if they lose in court…………..”

    The link says. “The U.S. Supreme Court considered making it easier for companies that successfully fight off patent infringement suits to collect legal fees from the losers in a case with ramifications for Apple Inc. (AAPL) and Google Inc. (GOOG)”.

    This is very much not a definition of and focus on “trolls” and the difference is a very big deal. The Supreme Court did not say here is what a troll is for example Google with no manufacturing or competence in cell phones sues for infringement a small manufacturer of a cell phone component. Oh no the SC says the malefactors are “losers”- i.e. anyone including the inventor who loses against the Apples, Googles, GEs and Microsofts of this country.

    Combine this with well known fact that a sufficiently well funded and staffed legal team can almost always beat a small company or individual and overwhelm a jury with expert witnesses, depositions and motions.

    It means that the deep pocket companies, government entities and universities can use their money to put on such a fight that they prevail regardless of the facts and truth and the more they spend making sure the other party is the loser, the more they collect later to destroy or drive to bankruptcy their opponents. Of course such fat cat thieves still enjoy the inventions they have stolen.

    This is justice only for the wealthy, and injustice for the real job creators, those inventors and small start-ups.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: